Digital Scholarship is often collaborative and the final product is inherently different than a thesis, dissertation, journal, or book. How should digital scholarship be evaluated? Is it only the content or does the interface and user experience need to be evaluated as well? Who are the peer viewers? How should credit be shared or “counted” if you are a student, faculty member, librarian or technologist? And of course the larger question- does Digital Scholarship count, full stop?
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Housekeeping stuff | THATCamp Lehigh Valley 2013 on Schedule
- Scott Rutzmoser on Join the Crowd: Hands-On Digital Humanities Crowdsourcing [Play]
- Clif Kussmaul on [Talk/Make] The Untapped Power of Digital Readers: Why are we still reading the same way?
- Erica Yozell on Designing a DH Program/Specialization [Talk]
- Jessica Aberle on Juxta Commons
Archives
Categories
- Administrative
- Archives
- Blogging
- Collaboration
- Copyright
- Crowdsourcing
- Data Mining
- Digital Literacy
- General
- Libraries
- Museums
- Open Access
- Research Methods
- Session Proposals
- session-make
- session-play
- session-talk
- session-teach
- Social Media
- Teaching
- Tenure and Promotion
- Text Mining
- Visualization
- Workshops